|
|
|
By Special Guest Blogger Sarah Walker
TMZ reports that Oksana Grigorieva, Mel Gibson’s ex, is asking a judge to make Mel Gibson pay just a teensy bit more in monthly child support. You know, up from $5,000 a month to more than $40,000 a month. Excuse me, let me just take a sip of this water.
SPIT TAKE
$40,00 a month???
Did I get you? Sorry. Let me dry you off.
That is so much money. I assume it’s for diamond diapers, or maybe diapers made from cash? Or just maybe is this a round about way of making Mel pay for being, well, less than a gentleman to her.
Wait, what? TMZ also says that Oksana gets $2,500 a month in child support from Timothy Dalton--the father of her 13-year-old son Alexander. What?? She was married to Timothy Dalton? One of the least known Bonds??? Impressive. So much I don’t know about this woman. I mean, I know what Mel tells me. Just kidding, I didn’t listen to those tapes because they sound awful. And I like, sweet mellifluous sounds, not awful sounds.
Oh, rich people. Good luck with raising those kids. They will be totally normal.
|
 |
|
|
|
Mel made his bed.....
Posted by: Michelle | 09/07/2010 at 10:10 AM
thread has been hijacked, moderator should delete the last four comments
Posted by: mycanadafirst | 09/07/2010 at 07:41 AM
i like small animals.
Posted by: uranidiot | 09/06/2010 at 11:30 PM
@ uranidiot, URAPussy!
Posted by: URAPussy | 09/06/2010 at 11:18 PM
Slut
Posted by: J. L. | 09/06/2010 at 08:56 PM
She is not a HO...she just fell down naked man mountain with her legs open one to many time
Posted by: Gail | 09/06/2010 at 04:13 PM
she is not looking out for the child, she is looking out only for herself and her own pockets, hopefully the courts will look at that. alot of people don't make $40000.00 a year and they support a family and she needs that much a month for a baby, good grief, maybe someone else should raise the child and not the nanny she is probably looking to pay with the $40000.00.
Posted by: give me a break | 09/06/2010 at 03:22 PM
Why Is it ok for all of you to berate oksana about being a gold digger? I say let mel pay for his indiscretions. Mel pay up and shut the f--k up. It sure beats jail time Mel. You definately deserve that, you woman and child beater. In jail you would be toast. Mel I say you are getting off easy!
Posted by: Tessie | 09/06/2010 at 01:24 PM
Yes, she is a tramp. Do not forget 'poor' Nicole S.
Mel should blame himself.Even true love couldn't put ip with ashtray kissing you... so what did he expected?
And stop to blame European women for looking good.
Posted by: A.B. TO | 09/06/2010 at 12:59 PM
Hey Ladies, Europien woman, the most of them used to provide for themselves, not like you Ladies, rise kids only and rellay on your husbands until kids grow up, and then I can see you at Wal-Mart cashier. It's the most of you. As someone said, if Mel didn't cheat on his wife, and wasn't dating younger woman with no reputation...
Posted by: A.B. TO | 09/06/2010 at 12:13 PM
Warning to middle-aged men!
STAY AWAY from women who are in their 20's or early 30's.
Posted by: Brian | 09/06/2010 at 09:35 AM
$40,000 a month??? She should be shot, plain and simple. The world does not need people like that living in it.
Posted by: pr | 09/06/2010 at 07:33 AM
Okay, regardless of her gold digging ways, even at $40 000 per month for 18 years until the kid can support himself legally, it only comes up to $8.64 million. Mel could spend that in his sleep during the time it takes for a dream to occur.
How much did Paul McCartney have to pay? How much is Tiger Woods going to have to fork out?
Mel's getting off easy.
Posted by: Darrell | 09/05/2010 at 11:54 PM
Women have it to easy. to take a guy for all he is worth. and the system is so wrong. how do you justify what they get in payments. women can`t survive with out useing a man. Pore Mel
Posted by: Howard | 09/05/2010 at 09:31 PM
Should she not have the lifestyle before she screwed her way to the top .
$5000.00 a month is plenty .
I am a full time single ( male ) parent and get nothing from my kids mother .
If Mel was smart he would fight for custody as a nanny is a lot cheaper than paying the " ho "
Posted by: Bob | 09/05/2010 at 09:23 PM
To "Lorne Ranger": I don't think the greedy-lawyer comment was necessary. Professionals deserve to be paid for their services. People screw their own lives up, go running to lawyers to fix them, then complain about having to pay them for it. My husband is an honest, hardworking man who works long hours, his phone rings all times of the day, and it ticks me off when people like you act like lawyers don't work for their paycheque like the rest of us.
As for the actual topic, I agree with "TakeADeepBreath." If Mel is going to make a baby, he can provide that child with the quality of life that Mel is acustom to, regarless of the status of his relationship with the mother.
Posted by: irritated | 09/05/2010 at 03:46 PM
Does anyone really believe that the extra money will go to the kids? Get real, it is for her only. Having said that, all of these people with loads of money in the world need to get a taste of real life.
Posted by: Robin | 09/05/2010 at 03:26 PM
She openedd her legs and was not taking proper precautions to prevent pregnancy. She is responsible.
This whole thing is like Johnny Carson's ex demanding $50K per month for groceries. Only if she eats every crumb.
Posted by: cdt | 09/05/2010 at 02:49 PM
No matter what you think about Mel, or Oksana (huge sigh of disgust here!), child support is supposed to be about providing enough funds to buy what is needed to raise the child comfortably. $5000 a month is more than enough to do that--hell it's more than some families of 4 live on in a month! $40000 a month is a ridiculous request: it doesn't do much for her credibility for asking a sum of that magnitude. And the honest truth is if she gets a shark lawyer she might just get it. Mel may not be an innocent party in the split, but if she gets a settlement like that then that will just lay precidence for every other gold digging ho bag to do the same--perhaps even to someone who doesn't have retribution coming their way! No wonder people don't believe in the legal system anymore.
Posted by: me11 | 09/05/2010 at 11:49 AM
Was there ever any doubt that this was about money?
Posted by: Gill | 09/05/2010 at 10:38 AM
@Norma: "...an open womb". Great choice of words! Nice play on the 'open wound' cliche.
Posted by: John Styles | 09/04/2010 at 08:42 PM
she never married dalton..he wanted a pre-nup to marry her she refused..when they parted..he agreed to support his son..but not HER..so the 2500.00 per month was deemed adequate by a UK judge.
she is a major golddigger..even with the 2500.00 from dalton she should be able to raise both children..god knows i get buy on much much less per month without starving.
Posted by: b taylor | 09/04/2010 at 08:16 PM
She is a Gold Digging "B" who should get a real job. She has not money of her own so she is an open womb - watch out Hollywood men. You could be next.
BTW - if you were with someone like her wouldn't that turn you into an "A"
hole too.
Posted by: Norma | 09/04/2010 at 07:35 PM
lisa, how could you ask such a stupid question. Why does anyone get pregnant, because they made love, without the glove. Don't be so judgmental, maybe one day it could happen to you or your daughter,sister, brother, you just don't know.
Posted by: estella | 09/04/2010 at 05:45 PM
i had an unccle that was dupped out of his money and wores the repect and love of his family by a gold digging @#$%^&**** wowman. she made him disown his family and give her all his cash and home. but she is in for a supries they will tie up the will in court till this gold digger dies .no one needs 40.000 amounth to raies a child my wife and i only made 40.000 a year get real she should work like the rest of us.
Posted by: rev.jamesrowland | 09/04/2010 at 04:34 PM
Really? Better a gold digger than an alcoholic, bigoted, short fused, can't keep it in his pants, over the hill actor.
Posted by: fred | 09/04/2010 at 03:02 PM
she is a tramp who is a queen at golddigging and he is simply stupid. Look at her, do you believe she has enough love to give to a another person when she is so inlove with herself, i find that difficult to beleieve. and $40000 a month for child support. That means the money is for the child. To many of these hollywood divorced mothers use the child support to line their own pockets and man .....does she have a big head!!!!
Posted by: john | 09/04/2010 at 01:03 PM
Ooohhh, people! The baby should have the same standard of living as its father. Why should it forgo what it would have had just because its parents split up? (Sorry about the "it" - I don't know if it's a boy or girl.
Posted by: TakeADeepBreath | 09/04/2010 at 11:17 AM
It is not alimony to pay for Oksana's needs it is child support to pay for the childs needs. (food, diapers, clothes) She already got 5 million for herself. Greed is greed and she takes the cake.
Posted by: christine | 09/04/2010 at 09:15 AM
GREEDILY much???
Posted by: Helen | 09/04/2010 at 07:41 AM
I am sure that both kids will be well taken care off as they grow up their fathers will give to them personally,she is getting enough now to take care of them she wants more to party it out this way she will hv to stay home and take care of the kids instead of hving a nanny.
Posted by: an observer | 09/04/2010 at 04:35 AM
It takes two to tango, as ye play, so shall ye pay, however you want to say it, Mel chose to be with this woman. I'm sure she didn't force him to make love to her. Granted I think that $40,000.00 is pretty steep for child support but she should be paid enough to maintain the lifestyle to which she became accustomed when they were together. He did provide it for her. He should shoulder the responsibility for HIS child. Her son with Timothy Dalton shouldn't even enter the equasion.
Posted by: Brian | 09/04/2010 at 02:36 AM
Yes, "poor Mel." No man deserves a gold digger clawing at his entrails like this demon chick is doing.
Posted by: John Styles | 09/04/2010 at 02:12 AM
Poor Mel? Are you $%^& me? Step away from the crack pipe. The guy is an A-hole with a capital A.
Posted by: fred | 09/04/2010 at 02:06 AM
Child-support and alimony payments are archaic. Get rid of them!
Posted by: John Styles | 09/04/2010 at 01:47 AM
Poor Mel. Women just suck.
Posted by: John Styles | 09/04/2010 at 01:42 AM
What a pity I was raised with morals and values. And I could've had it so easy all these years had I headed to Hollywood and screwed a couple of rich actors out of a sperm donation instead of working and saving all these years. I only I'd realized how EASY it was .. oh yes, I guess I'd have to put up with a couple kids, hmm.
Posted by: Kinney | 09/03/2010 at 11:48 PM
he should have put a cover on his disco stick and he wouldn't be in this position.It takes two...
Posted by: Micheline | 09/03/2010 at 10:09 PM
K, this is sooo stupid - she is marginal looking at best, and obviously doesn't have morals/values as does Mel's ex Robin. WTF? Guessing to just write it off as a mid-life crises or she must give a heck of a good bj. Wha??? what's that they say about Karma? She'll get hers for certain
Posted by: Paddi | 09/03/2010 at 09:57 PM
A man with the kind of money he has should be ashamed to be paying $5,000 per month for his child. Whatever he may now feel for the mother of his kid, he did not feel that way when he was messing around with her and they made that baby. Now he want to act like a jerk and disregard the welfare of his child. These so called celebs in hollywood make me sick. They want their cake and eat it too. What makes her such a bad person, and him so good all of a sudden.
Posted by: estella | 09/03/2010 at 09:42 PM
North American women latch onto men for money too, the divorce industry is just one big scam. Women nowadays are abusing the priviledges bestowed upon them by modern society, and lawyers are taking it too the bank.....like everything they get their greedy hands on
Posted by: Lorne Ranger | 09/03/2010 at 09:21 PM
Oksana is such a "ho". It sure is true that these European women latch onto men with money and its not for love. Shame on you Oksana. Get a life and get a real job.
Posted by: MARY | 09/03/2010 at 08:49 PM
Why else did she get pregnant if not for the paycheque?
Posted by: Lisa | 09/03/2010 at 08:27 PM
A lot of us mess up our lives now and then but Mel has to be asking, " What Happened"!
Posted by: James Hunter | 09/03/2010 at 08:23 PM
Oksama is obviously kicking Gibson in the ass with alimony raise which she won't get since Gibson's money is tied up in investments, not to mention ex-wife gets half of all.
Particularly that she has already made a mockery out of Gibson with those tapes that should of been private.
Posted by: Sylvia | 09/03/2010 at 07:17 PM
Baby deserves what it needs, no more no less...she should not be an issue. Oksana on the other hand...."Get a real job" Mel doesn't owe you anything!
Posted by: Lee Ann Wilson | 09/03/2010 at 07:08 PM
That is just bloody insane! My husband and I work our asses off to barely make about $21,000 a year to pay bills, rent and take care of our daughter. I think it's complete crap that she can just demand that kind of money claiming it's for their baby.
Greedy bint!
Posted by: MWilkes | 09/03/2010 at 06:47 PM
gold digger or what!
I guess she doesn't have the skills for a normal job so she has found a more comfortable way to make $.
What a ho!!
Posted by: Joan W. | 09/03/2010 at 06:38 PM
Sounds like she's a professional on Mother's allowance.
Posted by: Frankiethepunk | 09/03/2010 at 06:37 PM
She wants a goldfinger and she is a gold digger. Nothing like trapping middle aged man to get his money. Dalton didn't have enough so she set her sights bigger, pockets I mean. If she gets 2500.00 for one and 5000.00 for another, SHE should be able to live in comfort from that. She has no career so she shouldn't need nannies. How does she justify this? My ex makes over 100 grand a year and I get $1500.00 a month for our 3 kids.
Posted by: Leissa | 09/03/2010 at 06:06 PM